Gail Dines Raises The Bar Of Mount St. BS To New Heights: The #2257 Issue

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Nina Hartley's "Pornified Nation" Interview: Why She's Porn's Most Eloquent Female Advocate

I know that I often sing the praises of Nina Hartley a lot here, because no other porn performer has been so eloquent an advocate for female sexuality or for sexual entertainment as she has been for the past 30 years.

In this interview that she did for Jordan Owen's newly crafted YouTube series Pornified Nation, though, Nina proves beyond a doubt that she's not quite ready to just slide silently into the sunset. Here, among other things, Nina breaks down her nearly 30 year career as a professional sexual performer, her progressive attitude towards her profession and her fans, and she gets in some significant and righteous kill shots at antiporn actiivists who dismiss her and her mission....with special venom towards her major antagonist Gail Dines and the antiporn feminists.

But...why listen to me, when Nina and Jordan can speak for themselves. Watch...and learn.

The original interview can be seen here at Jordan's YouTube channel.

Also catch the previous two episodes of Pornified Nation featuring Michael Whiteacre and Siri.

Euro Porn Ban Update: Cooler, Smarter Heads Prevail; Porn Ban Language Striken Down....For Now

Well, maybe the European Parliament might not be so bad after all.

Here's the breaking story from C|Net:

Today, 625 members of the European Parliament voted 368-159 in favor of passing a report aimed at stamping out gender stereotypes in the region, with 98 abstaining. However, the controversial "porn ban" section of the proposal was rejected.

This vote forms a majority opinion based on Europe's voting politicians, from which the European Commission can form legislation. Such a law would again be voted upon, and become legally binding in the 27 member state bloc of the EU.

Because the opinion of the Parliament has now been made, it will be extraordinarily difficult for the Commission to draw up similar porn-blocking legislation only to pass it back to the Parliament for another vote.

Unfortunately, while the attempt to directly ban porn was defeated, there still remains some controversy over the interpretation of what was passed, and how it could potentially spawn future attempts at censorship of sexual media. Again, quoting C|Net:

These porn-blocking proposals, initially introduced by Dutch Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the Socialist Party Kartika Tamara Liotard, were buried within a report titled "Eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU," which was first submitted to the Parliament in early December. The report no doubt had positive intentions as a bid to close the gender inequality gap in the region by developing awareness and effective measures to reduce the prevalence of gender stereotypes in education, employment, and the media.

However, controversy quickly stirred because the report included such wide-ranging and ill-defined measures as calling on the European Union to reaffirm its position on an earlier resolution for a "ban on all forms of pornography in the media," as well as giving Internet service providers "policing rights" over their subscribers.

Amendments to the report removed certain explanatory text, but not the references to the previous resolution that was passed by the Parliament, which called for a blanket ban on pornography in the region in 1997.

While the explanation was removed, the effect was not, according to Swedish MEP for the Pirate Party Rick Falkvinge.

He explained that a "split vote" was called on to delete the sentence -- "which called for a ban on all forms of pornography in the media" -- but in spite of this, the 1997 resolution remains referenced, and therefore the call to ban "all forms of pornography in the media" remains intact.

Falkvinge said that striking out this text "has no other effect than deliberately obscuring the purpose of the new report."

But to make matters worse, when a handful of MEPs called on their citizens to e-mail their representatives in protest, the parliament's own IT department began to block these e-mails en masse from arriving in politicians' inboxes.

Pirate Party member Christian Engström, who first brought the news to light, called the move an "absolute disgrace", and said that he would complain to the Parliament's president about this "totally undemocratic practice."

The irony was that the method used to block the opposing emails was to label the phrase "gender stereotypes" as spam....on International Women's Day. In a proposal supposedly geared to attacking "gender stereotypes".

It'll be pretty interesting to see the response from folk like Gail Dines on this one. She's not known to take rejection too kindly.

The rest of Europe, at least for now, can freely exhale a sigh of relief.