Quoting from RawStory.com:
FCC proposes free Internet... as long as it's censored
05/29/2008 @ 7:47 pm
By Peter Kaplan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. communications regulators are considering auctioning a piece of the airwaves to buyers willing to provide free broadband Internet service without pornography.
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin is proposing to auction an unused piece of 25 megahertz wireless spectrum, with the condition that the winning bidder offer free Internet access and filter out obscene content on part of those airwaves, a spokesman for the FCC said on Thursday.
"We're hoping there will be increased interest in the proposal; and because this will provide wireless broadband services to more Americans, it is certainly something we want to see," said FCC spokesman Rob Kenny.
Under Martin's proposal, the winner would be allowed to use the rest of the airwaves for commercial services.
The plan would address criticism from some consumer advocates, who say the government has not done enough to get broadband service into more households. It also could win praise from anti-obscenity watchdog groups.
"I think there are a number of features of the plan that would be attractive to various constituencies," said Stifel Nicolaus analyst Blair Levin.
But the plan got a lukewarm response from existing wireless carriers. The industry's chief trade group, called CTIA, said auction provisions such as the free-service requirement were too rigid.
"CTIA supports flexible auction rules that allow any and all entities to participate," the group said in a statement.
The winning bidder also would have to build out the system to serve 50 percent of the U.S. population within four years and 95 percent within 10 years.
Further details of the plan have yet to be worked out, but Martin's plan is expected to come up at the FCC's next meeting on June 12.
Martin's proposal is similar to a plan put forth previously by a start-up company called M2Z. Under that plan, which was not approved by the FCC, M2Z would have been given the spectrum at no up-front cost. It would have provided free service, generating revenue partly through advertising.
The 25 MHz spectrum at issue is not viewed as highly attractive to wireless carriers, unlike the 700 MHz spectrum auctioned by the FCC earlier this year. There has been little previous interest in it, aside from the M2Z proposal.
Now, being the house populist Leftist on the panel here, I'm pretty much in full support of providing anything that would open up Internet access to communities that are economically lacking.
The problem is: why does it have to be censored??
Don't end users already have means to filter out "objectionable" content at their end through filtering software, rating systems, and the like?? Why is there such a need to have the government (even through a private proxy) do the censoring for them??
Or is this just a ploy by the Bush FCC to win back both Christian Rightists (who would love to impose their biases on working and poor folk, and right-wing populists (who would love the idea of having a free public space to vent their spleen against the usual "liberal" enemies)??
And...would the "censorship" be limited mainly to sexual imagery or actions (similar to the filters used by public libraries to block out "pornography", which also end up blocking out lots and lots of other information that rightists might not think that the public should see)??
If this is what they mean by "free Internet"; then no thanks, I'd rather pay for mine. Remove those content restrictions and allow for a truly free Internet spectrum (but with reduced speed from the paid providers); though, and you may have something.