Friday, August 10, 2007

Not anti-porn? You must be a man.

Most women can relate to how shitty it feels to have your thoughts and feelings completely discounted, just written off as being "too emotional" or the result of PMS. It sucks. It removes all agency and is a convenient way of not letting women's voices be heard.

So the "male-identified" accusation is different, how...?

Answer: it's not. It's dismissive and it reinforces gender stereotypes.

And, too, it's not acceptable to discount men as thinking with their dicks, or being "creepy" simply for having an interest in sex (see Dacia's post on that topic), or the other gendered stereotypes that are often attached to men.

Note, I am not talking about calling men out on male privilege. Women (and other men) should absolutely do that, especially as part of a feminist, progressive discourse. And men should listen, and learn. So before anyone goes there, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about stereotypes. And stereotypes aren't good for anybody.

I guess the only thing worse that being called a man because of your stance on porn, is actually being a man and holding that same stance on porn. (Or perhaps one is not worse than the other, but rather they're two sides of the same shit-covered coin.)

Marty Klein didn't get "you're just like a man" or "you must be a man" or "you sound like a man." Instead, he got, "I am not surprised that you arrogantly only see this from a man’s point of view."

Convenient, isn't it? If someone makes an argument about porn you don't like, they're either a man, or they're male-identified. Because certainly no real woman would have that kind of (reasoned, well-thought-out) opinion about porn. That is "a man's point of view." No woman could have that point of view. Nice girls don't.

Talk about removing women's agency. We're either victims, or we're male-identified. Riiiight.

Or, as Marty Klein put it:

What you’ve done is just as bad as dismissing a woman’s opinion as “just a woman being emotional,” or “women just don’t get it,” or “she’s just premenstrual.” If we want to get beyond “women only think with their hormones,” we have to get past “men only think with their penises.”

13 comments:

  1. Marty Klein? Isn't he the one who...I thought Susie Bright wrote about him, among others. Not a Friend, ultimately, I thought.

    not that that has to do with your point here, just notin'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Marty Klein? Isn't he the one who...I thought Susie Bright wrote about him, among others. Not a Friend, ultimately, I thought."

    Why not? I always thought he seemed fine.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Did Susie Bright write about him? If so, I don't think I've read it. Do you have it, or should I Google?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmmmm....the onnly connection I could find between Susie Bright and Marty Klein was that Susie had endorsed his latest book "America's War on Sex". They both seem like they respect each other.

    Other than the fact that he is more of a liberal politically and I'm more of a radical, I see nothing that would strange to me about his philosophy. He certainly sounds pretty progressive sexually to me.


    Anthony

    ReplyDelete
  5. On the original subject, though....it is one thing to call men out on their obvious privileges of benefitting in a mostly patriarchial society (though understanding that such privileges won't affect all men equally). It is another thing entirely to attempt to shut down a conversation on sexuality with "Oh, why should we listen to you? You're a MAN who only thinks with your dick!!"

    Because no woman would ever think of sex for its own pleasure and its own sake (and if they do, that's just Teh Patriarchy forcing them to do it).

    Because any man who does not repress his supposedly "unatural" urges to "degrade" and "abuse" all women by thinking of one or two as sexual fantasy subjects ("sex objects"), and only put women in a high pedestal to be sought after for "intimacy" is inevitably headed to rape and injure the first woman he sees.

    Besides, what's the big deal IF a man sometimes lets his little head do his thinking for him on occasion?? As long as he is respectful of the wishes and the humanity of the subjects of his desire, it shouldn't matter one bit.

    Personally, I think that attitudes expressed by women like the one who accosted Dr. Klein do far more to dehumanize women and men than any male lustful gaze ever did.


    Anthony

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Besides, what's the big deal IF a man sometimes lets his little head do his thinking for him on occasion?? As long as he is respectful of the wishes and the humanity of the subjects of his desire, it shouldn't matter one bit."

    WWhile I've definitely heard some sexist versions of exactly this argument, as you're presenting it I agree. There's a lot of assumption in the anti-porn camp or the radical camp or the "sex-critical" (I've heard that one a few times) that not thinking, that allowing oneself the luxury of not always functioning totally intellectually when sex is involved is somehow bad, damaging, will lead to wallowing in the wrong fantasies..

    ...and, well, humans just are not built to always and ever amen be examining. Sometimes we act on instinct. Shock horror.

    ReplyDelete
  7. okay, i might be confused. who was the one who ended up contributing to that kind of sex panic Time article about pr0n on the Internets, the one with the kid with enormous eyes?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Belle....I did some Googling, and found an article in Harpers' Magazine circa 1995 titled "How Time Fueled The Internet Porn Scare"...but it's placed behind a subscription firewall, so I couldn't even read it.

    AFAIK, I didn't see either Susie Bright or Marty Klein's name in that original article...so it must be someone else you were thinking of.


    Anthony

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yeah, that's the one, I'll look it up later.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm pro-porn and a guy. But I neither like nor watch porn. I've tried several times but always turn the film off after fifteen minutes. I just get bored.

    But I do like my private porn that I make up in my own mind.

    I'm in favor of porn because I think it does more harm than good. And tend to favor very simple-minded ideas about freedom of expression.

    ReplyDelete
  12. iacb: I knew it was a "Marty," thanks. yeah, him.

    I'm in favor of porn because I think it does more harm than good.

    hmm.

    ReplyDelete